Psypoke http://mobile.www.psypokes.com/forums/ |
|
unwanted pokémon http://mobile.www.psypokes.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=19023 |
Page 1 of 5 |
Author: | Mr. Jelly! [ Tue Aug 28, 2007 9:38 am ] |
Post subject: | unwanted pokémon |
if you had the chance to eliminate any pokémon off the dex, which will it be and why? i say: ![]() |
Author: | Pillage [ Tue Aug 28, 2007 10:19 am ] |
Post subject: | |
![]() ![]() Yeah I don't like Likitung's evolution either. I swear he looked 100x better as a neutral Pokemon. He was on my Top 10 Kanto Pokemon... oh well ![]() |
Author: | pokeassassin [ Tue Aug 28, 2007 11:36 am ] |
Post subject: | |
i would get rid of ![]() |
Author: | dunsparce [ Tue Aug 28, 2007 2:08 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Pillage wrote: ![]() ........................................ ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Author: | poplers [ Tue Aug 28, 2007 3:09 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
![]() that is all. :O |
Author: | Ghett0 [ Tue Aug 28, 2007 3:32 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
BIdoof are only annoying at the beginning of the game, but lemme think here, I say : ![]() |
Author: | dunsparce [ Tue Aug 28, 2007 3:37 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
poplers wrote: {dunsparce}
that is all. :O ![]() ![]() ![]() Whyz? He is weird looking and fun to look at. It also shows that they have some ingenuity left ![]() |
Author: | GrassNBugTyson [ Tue Aug 28, 2007 4:05 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
![]() ![]() ![]() Are basically female versions of ![]() ![]() ![]() but, as you can tell, I'd favor a grass pokemon over any of them (P.S. Do pokémon™ pictures count as emoticons since they're under emoticons?) |
Author: | poplers [ Tue Aug 28, 2007 4:05 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
lol @ your plea to make dunsparce cooler than he really is. Ingenuity? Making a dead blind worm, adding a horrible colorscheme, not to mention bad moves/stats, then throwing baby wings on it doesn't make it ingenuitive. >.> His ugly tail doesn't help, and neither does his gross-pincer like jaws/teeth. ![]() >:O |
Author: | Eon [ Tue Aug 28, 2007 4:32 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
GrassNBugTyson wrote: {ralts} ![]() ![]() Are basically female versions of ![]() ![]() ![]() but, as you can tell, I'd favor a grass pokemon over any of them |
Author: | dunsparce [ Tue Aug 28, 2007 4:47 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
poplers wrote: lol @ your plea to make dunsparce cooler than he really is.
Ingenuity? Making a dead blind worm, adding a horrible colorscheme, not to mention bad moves/stats, then throwing baby wings on it doesn't make it ingenuitive. >.> His ugly tail doesn't help, and neither does his gross-pincer like jaws/teeth. Um, yeah that about sums it up ![]() I agree it's a horrible battler but I don't think the should remove him from the dex :roll: . |
Author: | pelligargetic [ Tue Aug 28, 2007 4:51 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
[17:54] <StudiousBariyaado> Phione, Gallade, Rhyperior, Whismur, Wurmple, Cascoon, Silcoon, Dustox, Beautifly, Luvdisc, Leafeon, Glaceon, Sableye pending, Skitty, Sealeo, Shaymin was on that list, but I was forced to take it off because Shaymin would be alright if it were a normal pokemon. It's kinda stupid that they made it a legendary. Oh, and btw, these aren't my least favorite pokemon. I actually LIKE some of them on the list. These are pokemon that have reasons for not existing, so allow me to go through them and list: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Frost wrote: but designing new Pokemon with the intent to replace the old ones (e.g. Beautifly/Butterfree) just added salt to the wounds. Ummm...yeah, pokemon that are meant to replace others don't really deserve to exist, as stated in Whismur's explanation. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Also, Glameow and Purugly are based off of different types of cats, whereas Meowth and Skitty are both kittens. ![]() ![]() Notice how none of the pokemon I actually HATE are on this list, and I actually have a good reason and explanation for all the pokemon that are? |
Author: | girog [ Tue Aug 28, 2007 5:50 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Do you understand how PO'd people could get by this topic? i'm astounded. |
Author: | Last_Redeemer [ Tue Aug 28, 2007 6:15 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
![]() ![]() too good in comptetitive battles |
Author: | Pillage [ Tue Aug 28, 2007 7:45 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Wow what's the hate towards ![]() And yeah ![]() ![]() |
Author: | Mr. Jelly! [ Tue Aug 28, 2007 8:20 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
"I can't believe nobody's said this yet... *cough* ![]() ![]() |
Author: | DNA [ Tue Aug 28, 2007 8:49 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
![]() ![]() 5 Eeveelutions was quite enough. We seriously don't need any multi-colored foxes cluttering cartridge memory. If there're more Eeveelutions coming along I will probably get so mad that I may just quit Pokemon altogether. That's how much I hate newer Eeveelutions. I wish there were only 3 of them. 5 was tolerable, but 7 is awful (and overdoing it). - DNA |
Author: | Pillage [ Tue Aug 28, 2007 9:15 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
SorcererDNA wrote: {leafeon} and ![]() 5 Eeveelutions was quite enough. We seriously don't need any multi-colored foxes cluttering cartridge memory. If there're more Eeveelutions coming along I will probably get so mad that I may just quit Pokemon altogether. That's how much I hate newer Eeveelutions. I wish there were only 3 of them. 5 was tolerable, but 7 is awful (and overdoing it). - DNA Yeah, very much agreed. 5 was perfect (Day and Night evolutions are cool) but the rocks are just dumb and they don't even look interesting. |
Author: | Darjulok [ Tue Aug 28, 2007 9:26 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
I agree with taking out ![]() ![]() I more Pokemon evolved with the Moss and Icy Rock, then it would have been ok (Roselia evolving with Moss Rock for example), but since those rocks are Eevolution exclusives, I prefer those rocks and evolutions to not exist. |
Author: | Mr. Jelly! [ Tue Aug 28, 2007 11:11 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
![]() Cus it's evil and it LOL'd at you when you're not looking! ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Author: | Pillage [ Tue Aug 28, 2007 11:12 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Mr. Jelly! wrote: {mew}
Cus it's evil and it LOL's at when you're not looking! ![]() ![]() ![]() HOW DARE YOU |
Author: | Mr. Jelly! [ Wed Aug 29, 2007 2:23 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Pillage wrote: Mr. Jelly! wrote: {mew}
Cus it's evil and it LOL'd at you when you're not looking! ![]() ![]() ![]() HOW DARE YOU *snort* that one totally crackd me up. ![]() ![]() |
Author: | Zero Cool [ Wed Aug 29, 2007 9:25 am ] |
Post subject: | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() a liable excuse to make more Venomoth and Butterfree. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() AND FINALLY, ![]() |
Author: | Rhapsody [ Wed Aug 29, 2007 9:34 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Leafeon is slightly more necessary than Glaceon, because it fills in the Grass Eeveelution that was left blank in RBY. Glaceon was totally unnecessary in my opinion and is nothing more than a Vaporeon who gets STAB from Ice Beam. Luvdisc seems like it was there just to fill up a spot in the Pokedex. It's useless, and unnecessary. They really didn't need Plusle or Minun, seeing as they're just Pikachu with slightly different body shapes and color schemes, but the two of them working together is unique. So I don't know what to say, really : they look like Pikachu and are electric types but they work quite differently than Pikachu. |
Author: | Pillage [ Wed Aug 29, 2007 10:03 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Gardevoir~ wrote: Leafeon is slightly more necessary than Glaceon, because it fills in the Grass Eeveelution that was left blank in RBY. Glaceon was totally unnecessary in my opinion and is nothing more than a Vaporeon who gets STAB from Ice Beam. No, Leafeon wasn't needed at all. They could've just made it evolve from the LEAF STONE not that dumb rock. Quote: They really didn't need Plusle or Minun, seeing as they're just Pikachu with slightly different body shapes and color schemes, but the two of them working together is unique. So I don't know what to say, really : they look like Pikachu and are electric types but they work quite differently than Pikachu. Still not needed at all.. |
Page 1 of 5 | All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |