Psypoke
http://mobile.www.psypokes.com/forums/

There's MimeJr. , so why not KangasJr. ????
http://mobile.www.psypokes.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=19668		 Page 1 of 1
Author:  MissingNo_Is_My_Friend [ Tue Sep 25, 2007 2:13 pm ]
Post subject:  There's MimeJr. , so why not KangasJr. ????
OK we've all seen the baby Kangaskhan in the pouch, but when you breed one, and adult hatches out of the egg with... another baby in it's puch!

When is Nintendo going to make Kangaskhan make sense?

{kangaskhan} :arrow: It's been there since Pokemon was created! When is it going to be an official pokemon!?!?!?!

(yes this is the 2nd kangaskhan topic I've posted in 2 days... I've got a problem, man...)
Author:  Pigeon [ Tue Sep 25, 2007 5:24 pm ]
Post subject: 
Yeah, that'd make a lot more sense. Plus, a baby Kangaskhan would be cute. Yay Kangaskhan!
Author:  DNA [ Tue Sep 25, 2007 7:19 pm ]
Post subject: 
Good - I'm not the only one that thinks this.
Yes, it makes no sense that a newly hatched Kangaskhan automatically has a baby in its pouch. It should have the pre-evo first, and then grow larger later.
But even so, is there even need for an egg? The baby in the pouch is very much alive and well to me.
Yet another example of why certain things in video games don't make sense.

- DNA
Author:  Joey90 [ Tue Sep 25, 2007 10:33 pm ]
Post subject: 
Should be a baby pre-evolution and a parallel male evolution... that way they can keep the orginal idea of a kangaskhan... but make a bit more sense from it...

OR

They could have an evolution of kangaskhan, but if you have a spare slot then you get a baby (which may or may not evolve into kangaskhan...)
Author:  psynvrn [ Wed Sep 26, 2007 12:43 am ]
Post subject: 
But if they create the evolution of {kangaskhan}, it would be wierd. {kangaskhan} is actually a 2 pokemon fused together, so if they create the evolution of it, there would be 3 {kangaskhan}s. A baby kangashkan should make sense.
Author:  pokemon_otaku [ Wed Sep 26, 2007 6:03 am ]
Post subject: 
A baby Kangaskhan makes perfect sense because the mother is always carrying around the baby in it's pouch so you'd think they'd make a pre-evoloution to kangaskhan but no. Nintendo makes no sense these days. Plus baby kangaskhans are super cute!
Author:  MissingNo_Is_My_Friend [ Wed Sep 26, 2007 8:35 pm ]
Post subject: 
Yay! Positive feedback!

It's great to know there are so many like-minded Pokemon players. It just makes so many things so easy to explain.

Thanks to everyone who dropped their opinion in.
Author:  Ice_Ball22 [ Wed Sep 26, 2007 8:41 pm ]
Post subject: 
yay a prevolution! i am 100% for that.
Author:  dunsparce [ Thu Sep 27, 2007 5:52 am ]
Post subject: 
Maybe the baby isn't a baby at alll, maybe it's part of a kangesgan's body 0.0!!! Maybe she uses it a scapegoat.

ZOMG IZ A CONPERSY THEERIST!!!


Nintendo doesn't do a lot of things it should......
Author:  Valentine [ Thu Sep 27, 2007 9:53 pm ]
Post subject: 
They'll say "No, that's actually a part of Kangashkan. Instead, we're gonna make a MEGAKANGA!!!!"

since they did that with electrabuzz. :(
Author:  MissingNo_Is_My_Friend [ Fri Sep 28, 2007 12:33 am ]
Post subject: 
Valentine wrote:
They'll say "No, that's actually a part of Kangashkan. Instead, we're gonna make a MEGAKANGA!!!!"

since they did that with electrabuzz. :(


Watch it happen in the next game, just because you said so.
Author:  sN0wBaLL [ Fri Sep 28, 2007 7:21 am ]
Post subject: 
Maybe each Kangaskhan doesn't have a baby in its pouch. Maybe the two creatures are symbiotes :shock:
Author:  Holifax [ Fri Sep 28, 2007 9:44 am ]
Post subject: 
I agree with most.

I think there should be a pre-evolution and of course a higher evolution as well.

It is hard to really imagine what Kanga would look like if he/she evolved seeing as Kanga is already pretty big.
Author:  Absol of Ire [ Fri Sep 28, 2007 1:40 pm ]
Post subject: 
they should do what they did with chansey - Pre-evolution and evolution.

Happiny caried an egg around right? so maybe the baby should carry like a doll around in the pouch it gets, and when it evolves, it finds some random baby thingy and puts it in its puch and nurses it until its bette/wants to leave, then the last form be like a normal/fighting type with like... baby kangas for armour {kangaskhan} {kangaskhan} {kangaskhan}
Author:  KOL40 [ Sat Sep 29, 2007 12:47 pm ]
Post subject: 
Absol of Ire wrote:
type with like... baby kangas for armour {kangaskhan} {kangaskhan} {kangaskhan}



that is the weirdest thing i have ever heard. and while i agree with the sentiment that it makes no sense, i don't think there should be a pre-evolution. i am TIRED of baby PKMN!!!!
Author:  Xiahou [ Sun Sep 30, 2007 11:23 am ]
Post subject: 
KOL40 wrote:
Absol of Ire wrote:
type with like... baby kangas for armour {kangaskhan} {kangaskhan} {kangaskhan}



hehehe you made my day...haha (still laphing)

Ya I agree with pre-evolution (the pink Kanga)

btw this is the last pokemon I remembered since I stoped playing pokemon couple of years back (yes im back to play pokemon :) ) , and I always wondered what is the ppokemon behined this wierd afghani name :lol:
Author:  The Jonatron [ Mon Oct 01, 2007 12:34 pm ]
Post subject: 
In the old pkmn Animie wasn't there like baby Kangaskhan walking around?

There should be a baby. Even if it doesn't have a different name. (the full name doesn't let you add ' Jr.' to it right?
Author:  Groudon King [ Mon Oct 01, 2007 8:19 pm ]
Post subject: 
In my opinion, if any Pokemon really needs a pre-evolved form it is Kangashkan. It needed it in the beginning, and why is it only female? They should allow you to get a pre-evolved Kangashkan without all the extra Incense items they give you for breeding, and they could have a male Kangashkan, just without the pouch and baby. It is really weird that when you hatch a kanga egg you get a full grown Kangashkan and baby.
Author:  Cuddles [ Wed Oct 03, 2007 9:33 pm ]
Post subject: 
a baby kangaskhan would be cute. maybe called gengababy? hahaha.....

but it would still be really weird. i mean a grown kangaroo with a baby kangaroo in its pouch LAYS an egg. then the two kangaroos leave, and the egg hatches into a baby kangaroo which has nothing to do with the baby kangaroo which already exists. come on, i live in australia and i know a thing or two about kangaroos. lol!

anyway, since when was all this supposed to make sense? i think it would be cool for there to be a baby kangaskhan, but we shouldnt get too carried away with trying to think about it logically. because if we did that, then we would have to stop playing........
Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/