Psypoke http://mobile.www.psypokes.com/forums/ |
|
Pokemon that should be other types http://mobile.www.psypokes.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=2194 |
Page 1 of 3 |
Author: | Lynx [ Sun Apr 24, 2005 10:34 am ] |
Post subject: | Pokemon that should be other types |
for example ![]() ![]() also, ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Author: | Gryphflame [ Sun Apr 24, 2005 10:40 am ] |
Post subject: | |
I've never really understood why ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Author: | flyingmonkey [ Sun Apr 24, 2005 11:19 am ] |
Post subject: | |
wow, good idea. all of the normal/flying types should have normal taken off them. Honestly, what's the point in having normal as a second type? Also, i've never understood why psychic is strong against poison. ![]() |
Author: | Myuutsuu [ Sun Apr 24, 2005 11:30 am ] |
Post subject: | |
![]() ![]() Rukario. Why is it Steel/Fighting? More like Electric/Fighting. ![]() |
Author: | Lynx [ Sun Apr 24, 2005 12:40 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Myuutsuu wrote: Rukario. Why is it Steel/Fighting? More like Electric/Fighting.
![]() thats interesting, i though Rukario looked like a dark/fighting type and yes, gyarados is water/flying, hense the double weakness to electric attacks... flyingmonkey wrote: all of the normal/flying types should have normal taken off them. Honestly, what's the point in having normal as a second type? i agree, but leave the normal type on a few of em... ones like pidgeot should be pure flying though |
Author: | Galar [ Sun Apr 24, 2005 4:13 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Pokemon that should be other types |
Lynx wrote: for example ![]() ![]() also, ![]() Quote: {arbok} should be a poison/dark ... not only is it a good type combination, but it fits arbok perfectly, though ekans should remain just a poison... Quote: {psyduck} and ![]() Quote: {kangaskhan} looks like it should be a ground type... i dunno about this one though... Agree with these aspects...Also, I guess ![]() |
Author: | Holifax [ Sun Apr 24, 2005 4:52 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Author: | sN0wBaLL [ Mon Apr 25, 2005 4:38 am ] |
Post subject: | |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Author: | Lynx [ Mon Apr 25, 2005 5:46 am ] |
Post subject: | |
sN0wBaLL wrote: {seviper} should be part Dark.
![]() ![]() agree (psychic/dark) agree (poison/dark) der, its already part bug (bug/flying) |
Author: | KinglerMaster [ Mon Apr 25, 2005 6:19 am ] |
Post subject: | |
I say that ![]() ![]() |
Author: | Galar [ Mon Apr 25, 2005 7:05 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
KinglerMaster wrote: I say that
![]() ![]() Aren't they?? Whoah! |
Author: | sN0wBaLL [ Tue Apr 26, 2005 2:41 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Sorry about the Masquerain. I meant it should be part Water. |
Author: | Aerodactyl727 [ Tue Apr 26, 2005 5:53 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Isn't Golduck Psycic any way if not sorry but no dragos ever should be flying type in my opinion.Cuz they are 4x weak agianst Ice . |
Author: | Twixt [ Tue Apr 26, 2005 2:37 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
it it was up to me, id make all pokemon dark type.......... ![]() |
Author: | pokemaster [ Sat May 07, 2005 10:55 am ] |
Post subject: | |
garados = dragon/water magikarp = water |
Author: | Sneaky Sneasel [ Sat May 07, 2005 11:00 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Um, Magikarp is Water; plus if Gyarados was Dragon/Water, he'd be almost 00ber. |
Author: | Benjamin [ Sat May 07, 2005 11:07 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Charizard shouldn't be part dragon, because he's going to have levitate or something to avoid ground attacks, and that would make him over-00ber. Only one weakness, that is. |
Author: | Lynx [ Sat May 07, 2005 4:09 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Water Pokemon Master wrote: Charizard shouldn't be part dragon, because he's going to have levitate or something to avoid ground attacks, and that would make him over-00ber. Only one weakness, that is. ummm, no, a fire/dragon levitate still leaves rock and dragon weaknesses, how are TWO weakness worse that someone like sableye, which has no weakness, or kingdra with only 1 weakness, dragon, or even pokemon with a single double weakness, like bug/steels and water/grounds... it wouldnt make him uber.... |
Author: | sN0wBaLL [ Sat May 07, 2005 6:44 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
![]() |
Author: | bobashotmace [ Sat May 07, 2005 7:07 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
horsea should be part bird, and flying should still be called bird. |
Author: | sN0wBaLL [ Sat May 07, 2005 10:08 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Urm, Flying should remain as Flying because it sounds dumb when Dragonite, Salamence and stuff like that are part "Bird". Anyway, why should Horsea be part Bird/Flying? It's a seahorse, and how can seahorses fly? |
Author: | Rare Pokemon Master [ Sat May 07, 2005 11:32 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Venomoth should be flying type |
Author: | psycho_freak [ Sun May 08, 2005 4:06 am ] |
Post subject: | |
I think Shenjina should be Dark instead of Bug (so that would make it Dark/Ghost) pwnage!!!! Also Groudon should be Fire/Ground and Kyogre should probably be Water/Psychic. |
Author: | tessa7338 [ Wed May 18, 2005 1:11 am ] |
Post subject: | |
The thing is that when comparing Groudon and Kyogre, people tend to go for Kyogre just bcos of the type advantage. So I agree with you. But Groudon learns Solarbeam... |
Author: | Lynx [ Wed May 25, 2005 7:54 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
psycho_freak wrote: I think Shenjina should be Dark instead of Bug (so that would make it Dark/Ghost) pwnage!!!! Also Groudon should be Fire/Ground and Kyogre should probably be Water/Psychic. ![]() when i first saw rukario i thought it should be a dark/fighting rather than a steel/fighting... |
Page 1 of 3 | All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |